From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arman v. Chamberlain-Weismiller

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED75831.

May 9, 2000.

APPEAL FROM: CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE DENNIS N. SMITH.

Donald V. Nangle; 7116 Oakland Avenue; St. Louis, MO 63117, for appellant.

Before Crandall, P.J. and Hoff, J. and Crist, S.J.



ORDER


Paul Arman (Arman) appeals the judgment of the trial court granting Carrie Chamberlain-Weismiller's motion to dismiss. Arman argues the trial court erred in failing to enter judgment on the theories of: 1) breach of contract, (2) conversion and 3) money had and received. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Arman v. Chamberlain-Weismiller

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
May 9, 2000
16 S.W.3d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Arman v. Chamberlain-Weismiller

Case Details

Full title:PAUL ARMAN, III, PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. CARRIE CHAMBERLAIN-WEISMILLER…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: May 9, 2000

Citations

16 S.W.3d 756 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)