From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 11, 2017
150 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

05-11-2017

In re ARLINGTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner–Respondent, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent–Appellant.

Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale (Paul A. Barrett of counsel), for appellant. Marschhausen & Fitzpatrick, P.C., Hicksville (Kevin P. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondent.


Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale (Paul A. Barrett of counsel), for appellant.

Marschhausen & Fitzpatrick, P.C., Hicksville (Kevin P. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondent.

Amended order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered August 8, 2016, which, among other things, granted petitioner's petition to confirm an arbitration award in its favor, and denied respondent's cross petition to vacate the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The arbitrator's award calculations were supported by the plain language of Insurance Law § 5102(a) and (b) (see Kurcsics v. Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 49 N.Y.2d 451, 456–457, 426 N.Y.S.2d 454, 403 N.E.2d 159 [1980] [analyzing the former sections of the Insurance Law] ).

We have considered respondent's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

SWEENY, J.P., RICHTER, ANDRIAS, FEINMAN, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 11, 2017
150 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re ARLINGTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner–Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 11, 2017

Citations

150 A.D.3d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
51 N.Y.S.3d 876