From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arline v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 20, 2020
298 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D20-221

07-20-2020

Clyde L. ARLINE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Clyde L. Arline, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Clyde L. Arline, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . See generally Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (dismissing habeas petition as unauthorized and explaining that such a petition may not seek postconviction relief based on a claim that could have been or was raised at trial or in a direct appeal; and also explaining that a court may not entertain a habeas petition that raises an issue that would be cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 ).

Rowe, Makar, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arline v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jul 20, 2020
298 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Arline v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE L. ARLINE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jul 20, 2020

Citations

298 So. 3d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)