From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arline v. Grant

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 10, 1973
272 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-695.

January 10, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court for Dade County; James W. Kehoe, Judge.

Horton, Schwartz Perse, Fuller, Brumer, Moss Cohen, Miami, for appellant.

Preddy, Haddad, Kutner Hardy and Burt E. Redlus, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment rendered after a jury verdict was reported for the defendant. The point involved urges that the court committed reversible error when it allowed a state statute as to the speed limit on state highways to be read into evidence. Appellant contends that the evidence in the record is only susceptible to the interpretation that the area in question was not subject to the general statute. The record demonstrates that the statute is relevant to the issue of negligence as presented to the jury.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Arline v. Grant

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 10, 1973
272 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Arline v. Grant

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE ARLINE, APPELLANT, v. BRIDENE GRANT, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 10, 1973

Citations

272 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)