From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arline v. Gower

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-3414 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-3414 WBS KJN P

03-07-2013

KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR., Plaintiff, v. GOWER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 30, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 30, 2013, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt. no. 24) is denied; and

3. Defendants shall file an answer within fourteen days from the date of this order.

_______________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arline v. Gower

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-3414 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Arline v. Gower

Case Details

Full title:KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR., Plaintiff, v. GOWER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-3414 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2013)