From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arline v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 10, 2016
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2016)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB (PC)

06-10-2016

KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR., Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [ECF Nos. 45, 52]

Plaintiff Keith Duane Arline, Jr. is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on the parties and contained notice that objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 4, 2016, is adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 10 , 2016

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arline v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 10, 2016
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2016)
Case details for

Arline v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:KEITH DUANE ARLINE, JR., Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 10, 2016

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00420-LJO-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2016)