From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arkali v. Muuss

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 1, 2015
130 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-07-01

In the Matter of Mustafa ARKALI, appellant, v. William MUUSS, et al., respondents.

Chambers, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.


Joseph W. Prokop PLLC, Central Islip, N.Y., for appellant. Dennis M. Brown, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Karin A. Bohrer of counsel), for respondent Suffolk County Department of Social Services.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Bernard Cheng, J.), dated January 27, 2014. The order denied the father's objections to an order of that court (Aletha V. Fields, S.M.), dated December 2, 2013, which denied his petition, in effect, for a recalculation of his child support arrears for the benefit of William Muuss.

ORDERED that the order dated January 27, 2014, is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the father's objections to the order dated December 2, 2013, which denied his petition, in effect, for a recalculation of his child support arrears for the benefit of William Muuss, are granted, the order dated December 2, 2013, is vacated, the father's petition, in effect, for a recalculation of child support arrears for the benefit of William Muuss is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing on the issue of a recalculation of the father's child support arrears for the benefit of William Muuss and a determination thereafter.

Under the circumstances presented, the father demonstrated that a hearing to recalculate his child support arrears for the benefit of William Muuss is warranted ( seeFamily Ct. Act 545; Matter of Johnson v. Carter, 83 A.D.3d 940, 920 N.Y.S.2d 730; see generally Matter of Griffin v. Griffin, 25 A.D.3d 797, 798, 807 N.Y.S.2d 570). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for that purpose and a determination thereafter.


Summaries of

Arkali v. Muuss

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 1, 2015
130 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Arkali v. Muuss

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mustafa ARKALI, appellant, v. William MUUSS, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5671
10 N.Y.S.3d 645

Citing Cases

Ahmed v. 760 8th Ave. Rest., Inc.

Plaintiff's reliance on Yehia v. Marphil Realty Corp. is misplaced, since plaintiff in Yahia alleged the…