From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arjo Inc. v. KPC Healthcare, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 16, 2024
8:23-cv-01323-JVS(KESx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-01323-JVS(KESx)

02-16-2024

Arjo Inc. v. KPC Healthcare, Inc.


Present. James V. Selna, U.S. District Court Judge.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than February 23, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date.

___X Answer by the defendant(s) or plaintiff's request for entry of default.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.

It is the plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1

It is so Ordered.


Summaries of

Arjo Inc. v. KPC Healthcare, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 16, 2024
8:23-cv-01323-JVS(KESx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Arjo Inc. v. KPC Healthcare, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Arjo Inc. v. KPC Healthcare, Inc.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-01323-JVS(KESx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)