Aristondo v. Adams

Full title: EDY ARISTONDO, Petitioner, v. DERRAL ADAMS, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jul 13, 2011

CV 09-5019-DOC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2011)

Opinion

EDY ARISTONDO, Petitioner, v. DERRAL ADAMS, Respondent. No. CV 09-5019-DOC (AGR) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. July 13, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.