From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arias v. St. Rosalia's Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 2001
286 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted June 20, 2001.

August 6, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated October 10, 2000, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant St. Rosalia's Roman Catholic Church in the Borough of Brooklyn in the City of New York which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Fredric Lewis, New York, N.Y. (Nicholas W. Kowalchyn of counsel), for appellant.

Conway, Farrell, Curtin Kelly, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jonathan T. Uejio of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

At about 11 P.M. on December 14, 1997, the plaintiff fell as she stepped from the courtyard of the respondent's property to the sidewalk. The plaintiff testified at her examination before trial that the courtyard was not lit.

The respondent moved for summary judgment based upon sworn statements of its maintenance worker that he was present on the day of the accident, that it was his practice to turn on the courtyard light at 5 P.M., that the courtyard light and the street lights were working on December 14, 1997, and that he was not aware of any complaints about the illumination in the area where the accident occurred.

Even if no lights were on when the accident occurred, the respondent established, prima facie, that it had no actual or constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition (see, Rivas v. Waldbaums Supermarket, 247 A.D.2d 600, 601). The plaintiff failed to submit evidence in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Wright v. South Nassau Communities Hosp., 254 A.D.2d 277). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent's motion for summary judgment.

O'BRIEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arias v. St. Rosalia's Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 2001
286 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Arias v. St. Rosalia's Roman Catholic Church

Case Details

Full title:LUCILLE ARIAS, appellant, v. ST. ROSALIA'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 6, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 695

Citing Cases

Hopstock v. Close

The defendants established a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence in…