From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arias v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 31, 2016
137 S. Ct. 370 (2016)

Summary

vacating and remanding a judgment predicated upon the refusal of the Court of Appeals of Arizona to grant Miller relief to a juvenile who did not receive a mandatory life sentence

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Commonwealth

Opinion

No. 15–9044.

10-31-2016

Jonathan Andrew ARIAS, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016).

Justice SOTOMAYOR concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 11, ––– L.E.2d –––– (2016) ( Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice ALITO, with whom Justice THOMAS joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 11, ––– L.E.2d –––– (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).


Summaries of

Arias v. Arizona

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 31, 2016
137 S. Ct. 370 (2016)

vacating and remanding a judgment predicated upon the refusal of the Court of Appeals of Arizona to grant Miller relief to a juvenile who did not receive a mandatory life sentence

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Commonwealth
Case details for

Arias v. Arizona

Case Details

Full title:Jonathan Andrew ARIAS, petitioner, v. ARIZONA.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 31, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 370 (2016)
196 L. Ed. 2d 287

Citing Cases

State v. Arias

This court granted review of the dismissal but denied relief. See State v. Arias, 1 CA-CR 13-0548 PRPC, 2015…

Jones v. Commonwealth

See id. at *–––– – –––– (Alito, J., dissenting). Our colleagues in dissent find it relevant that the Court…