From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arenson Office Furnishings, Inc. v. Kopelman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2021
1:20-cv-10497-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-10497-MKV

09-13-2021

ARENSON OFFICE FURNISHINGS, INC, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL KOPELMAN, Defendant.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendants informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 24]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by October 13, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arenson Office Furnishings, Inc. v. Kopelman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2021
1:20-cv-10497-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Arenson Office Furnishings, Inc. v. Kopelman

Case Details

Full title:ARENSON OFFICE FURNISHINGS, INC, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL KOPELMAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-10497-MKV (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2021)