Arellano v. State

Full title: Antonio ARELLANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

90 So. 3d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–1452.

2012-06-20

Antonio ARELLANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 472006CF000547A and 472006CF000860A. William A. Santana of Law Offices of William A. Santana, P.A., Winter Garden, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 472006CF000547A and 472006CF000860A.
William A. Santana of Law Offices of William A. Santana, P.A., Winter Garden, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)( Padilla v. Ky., ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is not retroactive); Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (immigration warning in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8) overcomes Padilla-based ineffective assistance of counsel claims).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.