From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ardis v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1967
29 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

December 20, 1967


Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 1, 1965, reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and plaintiff's motion to vacate two orders of said court, dated December 9, 1963 and September 9, 1964, respectively, and for other relief granted. The September, 1964 order dismissing the complaint was procured without compliance by defendant with CPLR 321 (subd. [c]), and should have been vacated ( Tournier v. Linden Gen., 26 A.D.2d 576; Vlahakis v. Sharf, 283 App. Div. 1087). The delay in prosecuting the action was adequately explained and defendant points to no specific prejudice which would overcome the beneficial policy that controversies should be disposed of on their merits ( Benadon v. Antonio, 10 A.D.2d 40, 42). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ardis v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1967
29 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Ardis v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:ENRICO ARDIS, an Infant by His Guardian ad Litem, FRED ARDIS, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1967

Citations

29 A.D.2d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

McDonald v. McCabe

The delay in seeking to file a second statement of readiness was adequately explained and respondent points…

Matter of Allstate Insurance Co. v. Phillips

ay notice requirement or the making of substituted service (see, 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶…