From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Archila v. Cates

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 7, 2024
23-cv-00512-RFL (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-00512-RFL (PR)

02-07-2024

OSCAR ANTONIO ARCHILA, Petitioner, v. BRIAN CATES, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RITA F. LIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to petitioner was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 12.) Accordingly, this federal habeas corpus action is DISMISSED without prejudice, because petitioner failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, petitioner may move to reopen the suit and have proceedings reinstated. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Archila v. Cates

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 7, 2024
23-cv-00512-RFL (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Archila v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR ANTONIO ARCHILA, Petitioner, v. BRIAN CATES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2024

Citations

23-cv-00512-RFL (PR) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2024)