From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arcadia Acupuncture, P.C. v. Nationwide Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 22, 2021
73 Misc. 3d 146 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)

Opinion

2020-791 K C

12-22-2021

ARCADIA ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., as Assignee of Juan Hernandez, Respondent, v. NATIONWIDE INS. CO., Appellant.

Hollander Legal Group, P.C. (Allan S. Hollander of counsel), for appellant. Zara Javakov, P.C. (Victoria Tarasova of counsel), for respondent.


Hollander Legal Group, P.C. (Allan S. Hollander of counsel), for appellant.

Zara Javakov, P.C. (Victoria Tarasova of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is modified by vacating so much of the order as granted the branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking (1) summary judgment dismissing defendant's affirmative defense that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath with respect to the claims received between May 11, 2018 and June 22, 2018 and (2) partial summary judgment on liability with respect to the claims received between May 11, 2018 and June 22, 2018, and by providing that those branches of plaintiff's cross motion are denied; as so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs). Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. In an order entered February 18, 2020, the Civil Court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment, stating that "Defendant [had] failed to issue the denials within 30 days of the second missed EUO," and granted plaintiff's cross motion to the extent of dismissing the affirmative defense that plaintiff failed to appear for duly scheduled EUOs and awarding plaintiff partial summary judgment on liability.

With respect to the claims received by defendant between May 11, 2018 through June 22, 2018, the record demonstrates, prima facie, that the EUO scheduling letters were timely mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co. , 50 AD3d 1123 [2008] ) to plaintiff, that plaintiff failed to appear for those EUOs, and that defendant timely denied those claims on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear. However, as we find that a triable issue of fact exists as to whether those EUOs were scheduled to be held at a place that was "reasonably convenient" to plaintiff (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.5 [e]; Parisien v Metlife Auto & Home , 68 Misc 3d 126[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 50845[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]), defendant failed to establish that it is entitled to summary judgment dismissing so much the complaint as sought to recover upon the claims received between May 11, 2018 through June 22, 2018. Consequently, neither party is entitled to summary judgment upon those claims.

While defendant further contends that the branch of its motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover upon the claims it received between March 22, 2018 and April 27, 2018 should have been granted and that the Civil Court erred in granting the branch of plaintiff's cross motion seeking partial summary judgment on liability upon those claims, defendant's argument lacks merit. The record establishes that defendant failed to timely deny those claims (see Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, LLC v 21st Century Ins. Co. , ––– Misc 3d ––––, 2021 NY Slip Op 21340 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2021]; Quality Health Supply Corp. v Nationwide Ins. , 69 Misc 3d 133[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 51226[A] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]). Furthermore, here there is no basis to disturb so much of the order as granted plaintiff partial summary judgment as to liability upon these claims.

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is modified by vacating so much of the order as granted the branches of plaintiff's cross motion seeking (1) summary judgment dismissing defendant's affirmative defense that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath, with respect to the claims received between May 11, 2018 and June 22, 2018 and (2) partial summary judgment on liability with respect to the claims received between May 11, 2018 and June 22, 2018, and by providing that those branches of plaintiff's cross motion are denied.

ALIOTTA, P.J., ELLIOT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arcadia Acupuncture, P.C. v. Nationwide Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Dec 22, 2021
73 Misc. 3d 146 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
Case details for

Arcadia Acupuncture, P.C. v. Nationwide Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Arcadia Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Juan Hernandez, Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

73 Misc. 3d 146 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
157 N.Y.S.3d 324