From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Araujo-Malagon v. Kane

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 4, 2009
No. CV-09-0187-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Nov. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-09-0187-PHX-FJM.

November 4, 2009


ORDER


The court has before it petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1), respondent's response (doc. 10), and petitioner's reply (doc. 11). We also have before us the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied (doc. 12). No objection to the report and recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired.

We agree with the Magistrate Judge that petitioner's detention is lawful and therefore we accept the recommended decision of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

IT IS ORDERED DENYING the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1).


Summaries of

Araujo-Malagon v. Kane

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 4, 2009
No. CV-09-0187-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Nov. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Araujo-Malagon v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:George Araujo-Malagon, Petitioner, v. Katrina Kane, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

No. CV-09-0187-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Nov. 4, 2009)