Aranoff v. Aranoff

Full title: SUSAN ARANOFF, Respondent, v. GERALD ARANOFF, Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1998

256 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

682 N.Y.S.2d 622

Opinion

December 14, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.).

Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal from the Qualified Domestic Relations Order, and leave to appeal is granted ( see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the Qualified Domestic Relations Order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the Qualified Domestic Relations Order is valid ( see, Internal Revenue Code [26 USC] § 414 [p]; Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1056 [d]).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.