Opinion
No. 3:17-cv-02041-JR
11-19-2018
ROSALBA PAOLA ORTEGA ARANDA, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendant.
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [16] on September 4, 2018, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [13] and dismiss this action with prejudice. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 18. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and concludes there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation [16]. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [13] is GRANTED. This action is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 19 day of November, 2018.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge