Arala v. Pentair Valves & Controls

Full title: OLUWANIKE ARALA, Plaintiff, v. PENTAIR VALVES AND CONTROLS, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-1300 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-1300

10-31-2017

OLUWANIKE ARALA, Plaintiff, v. PENTAIR VALVES AND CONTROLS, Defendant.

SIM LAKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending is Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 42). The Court has received from the Magistrate Judge a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation (Document No. 50). Defendant has filed a Response to Plaintiff's Objection(Document No. 51), to which Plaintiff has filed a further Response (Document No. 52).

The Court, after having made a de novo determination of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, the Memorandum and Recommendation, and the Objections and Briefing related thereto, is of the opinion that the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are correct and should be and hereby are accepted by the Court in their entirety. It is, therefore,

ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed and entered on September 19, 2017, which is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of this Court, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 42) is GRANTED.

Signed at Houston, Texas this 31st day of October, 2017.

/s/_________

SIM LAKE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE