Opinion
CIVIL NO. 11-00449 LEK-BMK
10-06-2011
In re: HAWAII STATE ASBESTOS CASES This Document Applies To: MINORU ARAKAKI and KATHLEEN M. ARAKAKI, Plaintiffs, v. CRANE COMPANY, etc., et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Roger E. Nelson and Rosalie J. Nelson's ("Plaintiffs") Motion for Reconsideration ("Motion"), filed on September 27, 2011. On September 30, 2011, this Court issued an EO which, inter alia, found the Motion suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Rule LR7.2(d) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i ("Local Rules"). The Court also stated that it would rule on the Motion without any further briefing from the parties. After careful consideration of the Motion and the relevant legal authority, Plaintiffs' Motion is HEREBY DENIED for the reasons set forth in this Court's Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration, filed in In re: Hawaii State Asbestos Cases (Nelson v. Crane Co., et al.), CV
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED AT HONOLULU, HAWAII, October 6, 2011.
Leslie E. Kobayashi
United States District Judge