From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Araiza v. City of San Diego

United States District Court, S.D. California
Feb 6, 2009
CASE NO. 07 CV 1921 JM (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 07 CV 1921 JM (WMc).

February 6, 2009


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL Doc. No. 52


The parties having so stipulated, it is ORDERED that the Fifth Amended Complaint for Damages, filed August 11, 2008 (Doc. No. 31-2), be dismissed in its entirety as to Defendant City of San Diego only. Both Plaintiff and Defendant City of San Diego are to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Araiza v. City of San Diego

United States District Court, S.D. California
Feb 6, 2009
CASE NO. 07 CV 1921 JM (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Araiza v. City of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:SERGIO ARAIZA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, KELENE MUNRO, and DOES 1…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Feb 6, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 07 CV 1921 JM (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2009)