From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 27, 1987
127 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

February 27, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Balio, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law by deleting the second decretal paragraph, and as modified affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term correctly denied defendant insurance companies' motions to dismiss. We do not, however, agree with Special Term that an order compelling the insurance companies to defend the action brought against Approved Pharmaceutical for indemnity should have been granted. Before applying the principles set forth in O'Dowd v. American Sur. Co. ( 3 N.Y.2d 347), there must first be a determination that liability coverage exists. No such determination has been made.


Summaries of

Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 27, 1987
127 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter

Case Details

Full title:APPROVED PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., Formerly Known as BEIJER DRUG, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1987

Citations

127 A.D.2d 978 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter

We also determined in action No. 2 that, because All Putter had been vouched in, it had been placed at risk…