finding no taking after decreases in value of seventy-eight per cent and ninety-two per cent on two combined lots
Summary of this case from Smyth v. Conservation Comm'n of FalmouthNo. 04-907.
February 28, 2005.
Certiorari denied.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 381 F.3d 1338.
finding no taking after decreases in value of seventy-eight per cent and ninety-two per cent on two combined lots
Summary of this case from Smyth v. Conservation Comm'n of FalmouthFull title:APPOLO FUELS, INC. v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 28, 2005
However, even quite significant reductions in value do not necessarily constitute a regulatory taking. See,…
Bordelon v. Baldwin Cnty.The Court agrees with Plaintiffs that their “reasonable investment-backed expectations” are judged by the…