Appling v. City of L.A.

Full title: RIOLORDO APPLING, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2015

CASE NO. LA CV13-08891 JAK (AJWx) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. LA CV13-08891 JAK (AJWx)

05-08-2015

RIOLORDO APPLING, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.

Honorable John A. Kronstadt United States District Court Judge

JUDGMENT

Defendants, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, SUE BRANDSTETTER, TIMO ILLIG AND THOMAS SMALL, (hereinafter "Defendants"), filed a motion for summary judgment on the claims brought by Plaintiff in his First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff, Riolordo Appling, opposed the motion, and Defendants replied. After a hearing on the motion, it was granted.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, SUE BRANDSTETTER, TIMO ILLIG and THOMAS SMALL and against Plaintiff RIOLORDO APPLING and that Plaintiff take nothing; and that Defendants may recover an award of costs, in an amount to be determined, following the filing of the appropriate application and the consideration of any objections.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATED: May 8, 2015

/s/_________

Honorable John A. Kronstadt

United States District Court Judge