From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 23, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06-cv-2768 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06-cv-2768.

February 23, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant, Cephalon, Inc.'s, Motion to Dismiss (doc. nos. 157 197), Plaintiff's response in opposition, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion as to Counts III — V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Cephalon shall file an Answer to Counts I — V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint on or before March 8, 2010.


Summaries of

Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 23, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06-cv-2768 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Apotex, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:APOTEX, INC., Plaintiff, v. CEPHALON, INC., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06-cv-2768 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

On February 23, 2010, after bifurcation of Apotex's patent invalidity/non-infringement and antitrust claims,…

Francis v. Francis

Moreover, “[t]he Declaratory Judgment Act's phrase ‘actual controversy' ‘refers to the type of “Cases” and…