From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apodaca v. Pine Glen Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1994
209 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court did not err in granting summary judgment to the moving defendants. The mere hope by the plaintiff that he might be able to uncover some evidence during the discovery process which would demonstrate that the moving defendants could be liable was insufficient to deny summary judgment (see, Frierson v. Concourse Plaza Assocs., 189 A.D.2d 609; Jones v. Gameray, 153 A.D.2d 550). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Apodaca v. Pine Glen Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1994
209 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Apodaca v. Pine Glen Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO APODACA, Appellant, v. PINE GLEN DEVELOPMENT CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 671

Citing Cases

Caldas v. 71st Avenue Associates

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiffs' allegations were insufficient, as a matter of law,…