From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Apeldyn Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 19, 2012
2012-1172 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

2012-1172

10-19-2012

APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

ON MOTION


ORDER

AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America move without opposition for an extension of time until December 5, 2012, to file its response brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

_______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq.

Donald R. McPhail, Esq.

Terrence D. Garnett, Esq.
s24


Summaries of

Apeldyn Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 19, 2012
2012-1172 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Apeldyn Corp. v. AU Optronics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

2012-1172 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2012)