From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aparin v. County of Gloucester

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 29, 2001
345 N.J. Super. 24 (App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

A-183-00T3

Argued October 2, 2001

Decided October 29, 2001

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, GLO-L-1306-99, whose opinion is reported at 345 N.J. Super. 41, 783 A.2d 271.

Before Judges Wallace, Jr., Carchman and Wells.

Joseph T. Carney argued the cause for appellants (Brown Connery, attorneys; William M. Tambussi, of counsel, Mr. Carney on the brief).

Thomas H. Ward argued the cause for respondents (Albertson Ward, attorneys; Mr. Ward on the brief).


The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Holston in his opinion reported at 345 N.J. Super. 41, 783 A.2d 271 (Law Div. 2001). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 484 (1974).


Summaries of

Aparin v. County of Gloucester

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 29, 2001
345 N.J. Super. 24 (App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Aparin v. County of Gloucester

Case Details

Full title:DAWN E. APARIN, DOUGLAS A. DANIELS, EDWARD DWYER, ROSE LEE FLEMING, JOSEPH…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 29, 2001

Citations

345 N.J. Super. 24 (App. Div. 2001)
783 A.2d 260

Citing Cases

In re Sigwart

We conclude the Commission's classification determination is not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable and,…

In re Messina

"Courts provide the widest possible interpretation of the [Civil Service] Act as it was designed to procure…