From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Antonelli v. Bureau of A. T. F. E.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Aug 28, 2009
No. 08-5410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-5410.

Filed On: August 28, 2009.

BEFORE: Henderson, Garland, and Brown, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, and the opposition thereto, and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. Appellant's opposition does not address the merits of the motion or raise any additional issues, and, thus, appellant has failed to preserve any issues for appeal.Cf. Terry v. Reno, 101 F.3d 1412, 1415 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (holding that a party fails to preserve any issues not argued on the merits in its brief).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.


Summaries of

Antonelli v. Bureau of A. T. F. E.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Aug 28, 2009
No. 08-5410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Antonelli v. Bureau of A. T. F. E.

Case Details

Full title:Michael C. Antonelli, Appellant v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Aug 28, 2009

Citations

No. 08-5410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 28, 2009)