From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anselmo v. Maryland Casualty Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2015
2:14-CV-00162-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2015)

Opinion

          K. Greg Peterson, Esq., LAW OFFICES OF K. GREG PETERSON, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Plaintiffs ELEANOR J. ANSELMO, individually, and as Trustee under that certain document entitled "The Albert A. and Eleanor J. Anselmo 1988 Revocable Trust" Dated February 19, 1988, and as Successor-in-Interest to Albert A. Anselmo, Deceased; KAREN L. LILIENTHAL, Successor Trustee of the Rosalie A. Anselmo Trust A under the Trust Agreement dated December 21, 1992, KAREN L. LILIENTHAL, Trustee of the Edward A. Anselmo Exempt Trust B under the Trust Agreement dated December 21, 1992; DAVE DAVELAAR, individually, and LINDA DAVELAAR, individually.

          Randy M. Marmor, Esq., SINNOTT, PUEBLA, CAMPAGNE & CURET, APLC, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY.

          Bruce N. Telles, Esq., AIWASIAN & ASSOCIATES, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Defendant CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF CASE

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, ELEANOR J. ANSELMO, individually, and as Trustee under that certain document entitled "The Albert A. and Eleanor J. Anselmo 1988 Revocable Trust" Dated February 19, 1988, and as Successor-in-Interest to Albert A. Anselmo, Deceased; KAREN L. LILIENTHAL, Successor Trustee of the Rosalie A. Anselmo Trust A under the Trust Agreement dated December 21, 1992; KAREN L. LILIENTHAL, Trustee of the Edward A. Anselmo Exempt Trust B under the Trust Agreement dated December 21, 1992; DAVE DAVELAAR, individually, and LINDA DAVELAAR, individually, and Defendant/Cross-Claimant MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, and Defendant/Cross-Defendant CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY (as successor-in-interest to CCI Insurance Company, as successor-in-interest to Insurance Company of North America), a Pennsylvania corporation, by and through their respective counsel, that all parties hereto agree to a dismissal with prejudice of the entire above-captioned action, including the Plaintiffs' Complaint and Maryland's Cross-Claim, in accordance with the terms of the written settlement agreement entered into between the parties.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         The parties having stipulated to the dismissal with prejudice of the within action in its entirety and having further stipulated that each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs incurred in the within action, and good cause appearing,

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anselmo v. Maryland Casualty Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2015
2:14-CV-00162-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2015)
Case details for

Anselmo v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR J. ANSELMO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, et…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 26, 2015

Citations

2:14-CV-00162-WBS-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2015)