From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ankeney v. Raemisch

Colorado Court of Appeals
Aug 22, 2013
Court of Appeals No. 12CA1930 (Colo. App. Aug. 22, 2013)

Summary

In Ankeney, the Colorado Court of Appeals held that a Colorado inmate who is subject to a mandatory parole scheme is entitled to application of good time and earned time credits in calculating the mandatory release date.

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. Suthers

Opinion

Court of Appeals No. 12CA1930

08-22-2013

Randal Ankeney, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick Raemisch, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections; Rae Timme, Warden of the Fremont Correctional Facility; and John Suthers, Colorado Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.


Fremont County District Court No. 12CV22

Honorable David M. Thorson, Judge

JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS

Division III

Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY

Gabriel and Roy*, JJ., concur

NOT PUBLISHED PURSUANT TO C.A.R. 35(f)


Summaries of

Ankeney v. Raemisch

Colorado Court of Appeals
Aug 22, 2013
Court of Appeals No. 12CA1930 (Colo. App. Aug. 22, 2013)

In Ankeney, the Colorado Court of Appeals held that a Colorado inmate who is subject to a mandatory parole scheme is entitled to application of good time and earned time credits in calculating the mandatory release date.

Summary of this case from Hernandez v. Suthers
Case details for

Ankeney v. Raemisch

Case Details

Full title:Randal Ankeney, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick Raemisch, in his official…

Court:Colorado Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 22, 2013

Citations

Court of Appeals No. 12CA1930 (Colo. App. Aug. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Farrell v. Colorado

In 2014, he filed a pro se prisoner complaint, alleging that CDOC failed to apply his good time and earned…

Hernandez v. Suthers

Mr. Hernandez argues that once an inmate has earned good time or earned time credits, the credits must be…