From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Angulo v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 30, 2021
No. 83153 (Nev. Jul. 30, 2021)

Opinion

83153

07-30-2021

JULIO CESAR ANGULO, Appellant, v. DIANA SULLIVAN; CAROLYN ELLSWORTH; NANCY LEMCKE; NADIA HOJJAT; AND LUCAS GAFFNEY, Respondents.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre J., Stiglich J., Silver J.,

Hon. Jasmin D. Lilly-Spells, District Judge

Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge


Summaries of

Angulo v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 30, 2021
No. 83153 (Nev. Jul. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Angulo v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:JULIO CESAR ANGULO, Appellant, v. DIANA SULLIVAN; CAROLYN ELLSWORTH; NANCY…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jul 30, 2021

Citations

No. 83153 (Nev. Jul. 30, 2021)