From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anglin v. Alrowhany

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 7, 2015
1:13-CV-01357-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2015)

Opinion

          JOINT STIPULATION OF FACT REGARDING DEFENDANTS' FINANCIAL WHEREWITHAL AND READILY ACHIEVABLE BARRIER REMOVAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON (Doc. 38)

          JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.

         JOINT STIPULATION

         The following terms, phrases, and definitions will be applied in this stipulation and are intended to conform to the usage given in the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines:

         SUBJECT PROPERTY: Strip mall located at or about 514 Finley Drive, Taft, California.

         VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING

         PLAINTIFF DEBRA ANGLIN AND DEFENDANT HIFDHUULAH A. ALROWHANY, BY AND THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE:

         WHEREAS Plaintiff has propounded written discovery to assist him in determining the ability of the Stipulating Defendants to undergo "readily achievable" barrier removal and to support Plaintiff's damages assessment; and

         WHEREAS such discovery information is of a personal and confidential nature and, therefore, the Stipulating Defendants have a legitimate concern about unnecessarily producing such information; The Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants enter into the following stipulation:

         Plaintiff: Plaintiff will currently forbear from propounding any discovery that seeks information concerning the financial status, ability, or wherewithal of the Stipulating Defendants. Plaintiff also withdraws all discovery already propounded concerning this information. Stipulating Defendants: The Stipulating Defendants hereby declare that in determining whether the removal of a BARRIER is READILY ACHIEVABLE, factors such as the (1) Stipulating Defendant's financial resources; (2) the facility's financial resources; (3) the "effect on expenses and resources"; and (4) impact on finances, shall NOT be raised by STIPULATING DEFENDANTS as a defense as to why the Stipulating Defendant cannot remedy and/or remove those alleged BARRIERS.

          MARK D. POTTER, ESQ., PHYL GRACE, ESQ., ISABEL MASANQUE, CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS, San Diego, CA, San Diego, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff DEBRA ANGL

          SHANE SINGH, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Attorney for Defendants.

          Furthermore, Defendants hereby stipulate that it is READILY ACHIEVABLE for the defendants to provide (1) a VAN ACCESSIBLE parking space; (2) an ACCESSIBLE path of travel into the stores at the SUBJECT PROPERTY; (3) an ACCESSIBLE path of travel to the Boost Mobil store the SUBJECT PROPERTY.


ADAAG: Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines found at 28 C.F.R. Part 36.

ACCESSIBLE: Complying with the technical requirements of the ADAAG.

READILY ACHIEVABLE: Shall have the same definition as that found at 42 U.S.C. § 12181(9).

BARRIER: Any architectural or configuration element of the subject property that does not comply with the technical provisions found in the Americans With Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines and/or Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, and which is identified in the Plaintiff's complaint.

SPACE: A striped and reserved handicap parking space that has a separate access aisle measuring 96 inches in width.

         NOTE: Stipulating Defendants are not stipulating (A) liability to the Plaintiff; (B) that the above identified barrier removals are required by law; or (C) that they are subject to the ADA or related state disability access laws.

         NOTE: The parties understand that the Plaintiff reserves his right to seek financial information in support of a claim for punitive damages. However, Plaintiff will forbear from seeking that information until Plaintiff believes that further discovery information warrants the prosecution of a punitive damages claim against the Stipulating Defendants. Even if Plaintiff reaches a decision that a punitive damages claim should be prosecuted, Plaintiff will, nonetheless, wait until the end of the discovery window to request such information so as to allow maximum opportunity for resolution of the case.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anglin v. Alrowhany

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 7, 2015
1:13-CV-01357-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Anglin v. Alrowhany

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA ANGLIN, Plaintiff, v. HIFDHUULAH A. ALROWHANY; ABDUL ALROWHANY, DBA…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 7, 2015

Citations

1:13-CV-01357-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2015)