Petitioner bears the burden "to negate every conceivable basis which might have supported the [legislative] distinction." Angelotti Chiropractic, Inc. v. Baker , 791 F.3d 1075, 1086 (9th Cir. 2015), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2379, 195 L.Ed.2d 274 (2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). Congress reasonably could have concluded that, because persons who regularly drink alcoholic beverages to excess pose increased risks to themselves and to others, cancellation of removal was unwarranted.