From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aneas v. McKinney

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 24, 2023
23-cv-00674-SK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-00674-SK

10-24-2023

DAVID ANEAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT ARTHUR MCKINNEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

SALLIE KIM, United States Magistrate Judge.

Upon review of the docket, it appears that the parties reached an agreement to resolve this action. (Dkt. No. 31.) In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within 60 days, with proof of service, that the agreed consideration for settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated, and this case shall be restored to the calendar and set for trial. If no certification is filed after passage of 120 days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Aneas v. McKinney

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 24, 2023
23-cv-00674-SK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Aneas v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ANEAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SCOTT ARTHUR MCKINNEY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

23-cv-00674-SK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023)