From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrew v. DeKalb County Board of Tax Assessors

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 10, 1990
390 S.E.2d 115 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

A89A1641.

DECIDED JANUARY 10, 1990. REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 22, 1990.

Tax assessment appeal. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Hunstein.

Norman R. Andrew, pro se.

Barbara B. Andrew, pro se. Albert Sidney Johnson, Lisa Foster, for appellee.


Norman R. Andrew and Barbara B. Andrew ("taxpayers") filed an appeal, pro se, to the superior court from a property tax assessment of the DeKalb County Board of Equalization. The superior court dismissed the appeal, finding that the taxpayers' notice of appeal was deficient because "[a] challenge to methodology is not a proper ground of appeal in accordance with O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311." This appeal followed. Held:

1. "It is clear that any taxpayer may appeal under the provisions of OCGA § 48-5-311 (e) and (f) `as to matters of taxability, uniformity of assessment, and value.'" (Emphasis omitted.) Vann v. DeKalb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 186 Ga. App. 208, 212 (2) ( 367 S.E.2d 43). In the case sub judice, the taxpayers' notice of appeal to the superior court provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Pursuant to [OCGA §] 48-5-311 I am this date appealing the decision of the DeKalb County Board of Equalization ... of the fair market value of my property located at .... 1st error — Oasis computer (SHP) — not in use factor — reads (SHP 55) = 35% — Should be SHP 70 = or 50%. 2nd error — Oasis computer (PHY) Typographical factor reads 65 = 45% — Should be 70 — or 50%."

"Tax assessments and appeals should be decided on the merits of the case without procedural technicalities...." Ledbetter Trucks v. Floyd County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 240 Ga. 791 (2) ( 242 S.E.2d 596). In the case sub judice, the taxpayers' enumerated errors to the superior court were not clearly defined. However, a liberal reading of the notice of appeal indicates that the taxpayers are challenging the assessed value of their property based on an alleged error in computation. This complaint is directed to value, an appropriate ground for review. See Williams v. DeKalb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 249 Ga. 164, 166 ( 289 S.E.2d 235). Consequently, the trial court erred in dismissing the taxpayers' appeal.

2. The DeKalb County Board of Tax Assessors' motion to dismiss this appeal and motion for damages for frivolous appeal are hereby denied.

Judgment reversed. Carley, C. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 10, 1990 — REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 22, 1990.


Summaries of

Andrew v. DeKalb County Board of Tax Assessors

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 10, 1990
390 S.E.2d 115 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Andrew v. DeKalb County Board of Tax Assessors

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW et al. v. DeKALB COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 10, 1990

Citations

390 S.E.2d 115 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990)
390 S.E.2d 115

Citing Cases

Interstate North Sporting Club v. Cobb Cty. Bd.

Ledbetter Trucks, 240 Ga. at 791 (2). See also Andrew v. DeKalb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 194 Ga. App. 274…