From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrew v. Buskirk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 17-3011 (3d Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-3011

01-25-2019

FRANK E. ANDREW, Appellant v. TODD BUSKIRK; FRANK LONGENBACH; ROBIN STANLEY


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(E.D. Pa. No. 5-16-cv-03851) SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING Before: GREENAWAY, JR., RESTREPO, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. Pursuant to 3d Cir. I.O.P. 8.3.1, the panel's previous non-precedential opinion and judgment filed November 19, 2018 are hereby VACATED. The panel will issue an opinion and accompanying judgment at a later date.

By the Court,

s/ L. Felipe Restrepo

Circuit Judge Dated: January 25, 2019
JK/cc: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Andrew v. Buskirk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 17-3011 (3d Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Andrew v. Buskirk

Case Details

Full title:FRANK E. ANDREW, Appellant v. TODD BUSKIRK; FRANK LONGENBACH; ROBIN STANLEY

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. 17-3011 (3d Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)