Andre' Boston v. V. Garcia

Full title: ANDRE' BOSTON, Plaintiff, V. GARCIA, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

2:10-cv-1782-KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2013)

Opinion

ANDRE' BOSTON, Plaintiff, v. V. GARCIA, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-1782-KJM DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 27, 2013

          ORDER

          KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

         On April 24, 2013, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed March 20, 2013, denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6), denying his motion for a stay, and denying his request to order defendants to provide him with a copy of his deposition transcript. The court has construed the objections as a request for reconsideration. Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 20, 2013, is affirmed.