From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andino v. Mills

Court of Appeals of New York.
Aug 25, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 83396 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

08-25-2016

Niurka ANDINO, Appellant–Respondent, v. Ronald MILLS, et al., Respondents–Appellants. (And a Third–Party Action.).


Reported below, 135 A.D.3d 407, 23 N.Y.S.3d 63.

Appeals dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division does not have the power to grant leave to appeal to this Court on a certified question from an order granting a new trial (see CPLR 5601[c] ; 5602[b][1]; Maynard v. Greenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 913, 914, 609 N.Y.S.2d 175, 631 N.E.2d 117 [1994] ; Fishman v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 78 N.Y.2d 878, 878, 573 N.Y.S.2d 68, 577 N.E.2d 59 [1991] ).


Summaries of

Andino v. Mills

Court of Appeals of New York.
Aug 25, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 83396 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

Andino v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:Niurka ANDINO, Appellant–Respondent, v. Ronald MILLS, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Aug 25, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 83396 (N.Y. 2016)
27 N.Y.3d 1180
38 N.Y.S.3d 89
59 N.E.3d 1201