From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andika v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Sep 25, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv153 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv153

09-25-2019

ERIC ANDIKA v. BRANDY N. ARMSTRONG


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Eric Anika, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.

So ORDERED and SIGNED September 25, 2019.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Andika v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Sep 25, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv153 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Andika v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ANDIKA v. BRANDY N. ARMSTRONG

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 25, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv153 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 25, 2019)