From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State of Nebraska

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 18, 1981
668 F.2d 349 (8th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

No. 81-2036.

Submitted December 15, 1981.

Decided December 18, 1981.

Durl F. Anderson, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court District of Nebraska.

Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.


Appellant Durl F. Anderson, dissatisfied with the progress of his marriage dissolution proceedings in state court, attempted to remove the matter to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the federal district court remanded the proceedings to state court and the appellant appeals. Various defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction. Based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court and on this court's opinion in Milligan v. Milligan, 484 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1973), the motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State of Nebraska

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 18, 1981
668 F.2d 349 (8th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

Anderson v. State of Nebraska

Case Details

Full title:DURL F. ANDERSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA; GOVERNOR CHARLES THONE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 18, 1981

Citations

668 F.2d 349 (8th Cir. 1981)

Citing Cases

Glagola v. Glagola

Even assuming diversity jurisdiction would otherwise be proper, federal courts generally do not exercise…