From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 8, 1999
744 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-3316.

Opinion filed September 8, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Cynthia G. Angelos, Judge; L.T. No. 97-1346-CF.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gentry Denise Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, Calvin Anderson, raises two issues on appeal. His first argument is that the court erred in admitting into evidence a photographic lineup comprised of photos that were identifiable as "mug shots". We hold the error in admitting the photos to be harmless. See D'Anna v. State, 453 So.2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Appellant's second issue is directed to the mandatory minimum term of his three year sentence. We affirm based on Anderson v. State, No. 98-3317 (Fla. 4th DCA July 14, 1999).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 8, 1999
744 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 8, 1999

Citations

744 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Lock v. State

This court has also recognized that the admission into evidence of a photographic line-up comprised of photos…

Baynham v. State

Therefore, there was no error. See Anderson v. State, 744 So.2d 475 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Fuster v. State, 480…