Anderson v. State

Full title: Dino Chavez Anderson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 25, 2016

502 S.W.3d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

WD 78866

10-25-2016

Dino Chavez Anderson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Natalie Hull, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent

Per Curiam

Natalie Hull, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant

Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, P.J., Cynthia L. Martin, and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Mr. Dino Anderson appeals from a judgment following an evidentiary hearing denying a post-conviction relief motion filed under Rule 29.15. We affirm. Rule 84.16 (b).