Opinion
No. 05-06-01062-CR, 05-06-01063-CR
Delivered: Opinion delivered July 24, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-40173-VQ, F05-40094-RQ.
Before Justices MORRIS, FRANCIS, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Issac Anderson pleaded guilty before a jury to two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen years. The jury found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at thirty years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine in each case. The trial court ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree these appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support these appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment.