From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. SGT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 27, 2017
14-CV-192-A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2017)

Opinion

14-CV-192-A

01-27-2017

ROMERO ANDERSON, 06-A-0077, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW S. PEDALTY. S. Sgt., ANTHONY SPAHALSKI, Corr/Off, SEAN F. DAVIS, Corr/Off, Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for the conduct of pretrial proceedings. On December 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge Roemer filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 23), recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (Dkt. No. 22) be granted, and that plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Roemer's Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed

The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor the defendants and take all steps necessary to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: January 27, 2017


Summaries of

Anderson v. SGT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 27, 2017
14-CV-192-A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Anderson v. SGT

Case Details

Full title:ROMERO ANDERSON, 06-A-0077, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW S. PEDALTY. S. Sgt.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 27, 2017

Citations

14-CV-192-A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2017)