Anderson v. Roop

Full title: DAVID WAYNE ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DET. B. L. ROOP; DET…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

No. 21-6866 (4th Cir. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-6866

12-15-2021

DAVID WAYNE ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DET. B. L. ROOP; DET. BRANDON TWEED; DET. LT. JAMES BLEVINS; WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF FRED NEWMAN, Defendants - Appellees.

David Wayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Anthony Piasta, JOHNSON AYERS &MATTHEWS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: November 3, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Thomas T. Cullen, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00155-TTC-RSB)

David Wayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Joseph Anthony Piasta, JOHNSON AYERS &MATTHEWS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

David Wayne Anderson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Roop, No. 7:19-cv-00155-TTC-RSB (W.D. Va. Feb. 19 &May 27, 2021). We deny Anderson's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED