From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 3, 1967
226 N.E.2d 103 (Ohio 1967)

Opinion

Nos. 40586, 40611, 40617, 40785, 40786, 40824, 40825, 40860 and 40874

Decided May 3, 1967.

Habeas corpus — Relief denied, when — Petitioner availed himself of postconviction remedy and was denied relief.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

In each of these cases petitioner is self-represented.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondents.


In each of these actions in habeas corpus, the petitioner is being held pursuant to a judgment of conviction of a court of record which had jurisdiction to render the judgment. In each of these cases, the petitioner has sought and been denied relief under the postconviction statutes, and is seeking the same relief in habeas corpus.

The petitioners are remanded to custody on the authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, Warden, 4 Ohio St.2d 4.

Petitioners remanded to custody.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT, SCHNEIDER and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 3, 1967
226 N.E.2d 103 (Ohio 1967)
Case details for

Anderson v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:ANDERSON v. MAXWELL, WARDEN. CHAMPLEN v. MAXWELL, WARDEN. BANKS v…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 3, 1967

Citations

226 N.E.2d 103 (Ohio 1967)
226 N.E.2d 103

Citing Cases

Stahl v. Shoemaker

(Modified in In re Copley, 29 Ohio St.2d 35.) The fourth paragraph of the syllabus of In re Burson (1949),…

Knox v. Maxwell

And more recently the court stated that where a determination under the Post-Conviction Act is rendered…