From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Jarrett-Chambers Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1925
215 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

November, 1925.


Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the contract of employment was made in New York between a New York employee and a New York employer, and on the authority of Matter of Post v. Burger Gohlke ( 216 N.Y. 544) ; Matter of Spratt v. Sweeney Gray Co. ( 168 App. Div. 403; affd., 216 N.Y. 763); Matter of Klein v. Stoller Cook Co. (220 id. 670) and Matter of Fitzpatrick v. Blackall Baldwin Co. (Id. 671). All concur, except H.T. Kellogg and Hinman, JJ., dissenting on the ground that the evidence taken since the reversal of the former award ( 210 App. Div. 543) brings the claim within the condemnation of Donohue v. Robertson Co. (205 id. 176) and Matter of Smith v. Heine Safety Boiler Co. ( 224 N.Y. 9), the work in which claimant was engaged at the time of the accident being isolated construction work in New Jersey and not incidental to any hazardous employment carried on by the employer in the State of New York.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Jarrett-Chambers Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1925
215 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Anderson v. Jarrett-Chambers Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. THEODORE ANDERSON, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1925

Citations

215 App. Div. 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)