From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Houston

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Dec 5, 2005
4:05cv3199 (D. Neb. Dec. 5, 2005)

Opinion

4:05cv3199.

December 5, 2005


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Before the court is filing no. 17, the Motion to Dismiss, in which the petitioner, David J. Anderson, with the advice of counsel, requests that the court dismiss the above-entitled habeas corpus case without prejudice. The court will grant the requested voluntary dismissal without prejudice. However, the petitioner is reminded that his ability to return to this court in the future may be circumscribed by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), the statute of limitations for habeas corpus actions brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

1. That filing no. 17, the petitioner's motion for voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, is granted;

2. That all other pending motions are denied as moot; and

3. That a separate judgment will be filed accordingly.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Houston

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Dec 5, 2005
4:05cv3199 (D. Neb. Dec. 5, 2005)
Case details for

Anderson v. Houston

Case Details

Full title:DAVID J. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. ROBERT HOUSTON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Dec 5, 2005

Citations

4:05cv3199 (D. Neb. Dec. 5, 2005)